Cincinnati's consumer goods manufacturers, insurance carriers, and industrial companies are embedding AI copilots and large language models into product, claims, and operations workflows. InfoSight's AI Penetration Testing Services uncover prompt injection, model abuse, and data exposure across these AI deployments before attackers exploit them.
Our red team probes Agentic AI, enterprise copilots, and RAG pipelines built on Microsoft Copilot, OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini for prompt injection, sensitive data and PII leakage, identity and privilege escalation, RAG data exposure, and API or plugin weaknesses, then translates every finding into measurable business impact for Cincinnati organizations.
Findings are mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, helping Cincinnati manufacturers, insurers, and industrial firms prioritize remediation and strengthen AI governance.
Just Researching Costs?
Get a preliminary budget estimate without scheduling a consultation or speaking with a salesperson.
Protect your Cincinnati organization with expert-led AI Penetration Testing Services from InfoSight.
We simulate sophisticated real-world attacks against your AI ecosystem to reveal the vulnerabilities that matter most. From LLM-powered applications and AI agents to copilots, chatbots, and RAG implementations, our assessments identify exploitable weaknesses such as prompt injection, data exposure, privilege abuse, jailbreaks, and unauthorized AI actions—allowing your team to strengthen defenses before attackers capitalize on them.
AI Security Practice Expertise
We are testers trained specifically in LLM exploitation techniques — not generalists running automated prompt scanners.
25-Year Regulated Industry Track Record
Since 1998 we've guided banks, hospitals, and utilities through every audit, breach, and compliance overhaul — now extended to AI risk.
SOC 2 Type II Attested
Independent SOC 2 Type II attestation proves our own controls protect the sensitive data your AI systems expose to us during testing.
Human-Led, Machine Validated
We use advanced tools at machine speed to find security gaps – then expert testers validate findings and use techniques to chain vectors together using human manipulation the way real adversaries do.
Governance-Minded Testers
Findings mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework — not just a list of broken prompts.
U.S.-Based Delivery Team
No outsourcing of your AI system's sensitive prompts, data flows, or architecture to third-party contractors.
Every AI environment has a different risk profile. Our Cincinnati AI Penetration Testing Service is tailored to your models, agents, and integrations, and delivers:
Real exposure, not assumed exposure. Evidence - validated, reproducible, ranked by business impact - instead of a guess.
A shrinking attack surface. Findings are tracked to closure, and Mitigator shows exposure trending down over each engagement.
A defensible answer for your board. When leadership asks "are we exposed," you have evidence, not an opinion.
A to-do list, not a PDF to interpret. Every finding ships with reproduction steps and remediation guidance your engineers can act on immediately.
A repeatable process. Each new AI feature gets tested against the same standard, so you're never starting from zero.
Most penetration test findings live and die in a PDF - read once, filed away, stale the moment the ink dries. InfoSight's don't. Every AI Penetration Testing engagement runs through Mitigator, InfoSight's proprietary threat-intelligence dashboard, and stays there for as long as you're a client.
AI penetration testing is an authorized security assessment that identifies vulnerabilities in large language models, AI applications, chatbots, AI agents, RAG systems, and enterprise AI integrations used by Cincinnati organizations.
Testing can assess LLM applications, AI agents, customer-facing chatbots, RAG pipelines, generative AI platforms, Microsoft Copilot, Entra ID integrations, APIs, plugins, and other enterprise AI systems.
Our testing identifies prompt injection, jailbreaks, sensitive data exposure, insecure output handling, excessive agency, unauthorized tool access, model abuse, and other risks aligned with the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications.
Yes. Testing is planned around an approved scope and can target designated environments, applications, and AI workflows to minimize operational disruption while validating real-world security risks.
Vulnerability scanners identify known technical weaknesses, while AI penetration testing uses adversarial techniques to evaluate how models, prompts, data sources, tools, and AI workflows behave under realistic attack scenarios.
Yes. AI security testing can assess Microsoft 365 Copilot, Entra ID, connected data sources, permissions, integrations, and potential pathways to unauthorized access or sensitive information exposure.
Testing evaluates whether prompts, RAG systems, plugins, APIs, AI agents, or connected data sources can be manipulated to expose confidential information or perform unauthorized actions.
AI systems should be tested before production deployment and after significant changes to models, prompts, integrations, data sources, or permissions. Many organizations also schedule recurring annual or semiannual assessments.
Deliverables may include an executive summary, detailed technical findings, vulnerability prioritization, remediation recommendations, compliance-mapped evidence, and a live security readout for stakeholders.